I've seen some of the stories that you're talking about around this election. Mark Zuckerberg just days after the 2016 election, the idea that fake news on Facebook, of which you know it's *** very small amount of the content, influenced the election in any way, I think is *** pretty crazy idea. But 12 months later, as the full scope of the role of misinformation and Russian trolls became more clear, Zuckerberg apologized, saying his comments were dismissive and that he regretted them. What's clear is that in 2016 we were not as on top of *** number of issues. We should have, whether it was Russian interference or fake news. By the time the 2018 midterms came around, Facebook was showing off its so-called election war room. It's really the culmination of two years of massive investments that we've made. The company also launched *** global fact checking program. No one tells us that they want to see misinformation. That's why we work with independent fact checkers to stop hoaxes that are going viral from spreading. The fact checkers, I don't trust them. But soon many conservatives and Trump supporters specifically took issue with fact check labels appearing over their Facebook posts. Anything I put on there about our president is generally only on for *** few minutes, and then all of *** sudden they're fact checking me saying this, that and the other thing, which I know is not true. Their fact checks are their fact checkers wrong, but Zuckerberg made one group exempt from being fact checked on his platforms, politicians. So you won't take down lies or you will take down lies. I think it's just *** pretty simple yes or no. Congresswoman. I'm not talking about spin. I'm talking about actual in *** democracy, I believe that people should be able to see for themselves what politicians that they may or may not vote for. So you won't take them down. In 2024, as candidate Trump gained in the polls, he had this to say about Zuckerberg in *** book published two months. Before the election, if he does anything illegal this time, he will spend the rest of his life in prison. After Trump won the election, Zuckerberg met with him at Mar *** Lago in late November. Then on Tuesday morning, everyone. Zuckerberg announced he was shutting down Mehta's fact-checking program in the US. After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote nonstop about how misinformation was *** threat to democracy. We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth. But the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the US too politically biased. That was *** very disappointing thing to hear. Alan Duke, *** former CNN journalist, runs *** fact-checking organization hired by Facebook. If in the 6 years that we are fact checking for Meta, we had been politically biased at all. They never said anything. We never heard one example of where that had happened. Were you surprised by Mark Zuckerberg's decision to shut down the fact checking program? I was and I wasn't. There's been *** lot of political pressure on journalists generally and fact checkers specifically from the Trump administration and its supporters. I'm surprised that the tech platforms in general um are being so accommodating to the government.