Skip to content
NOWCAST 바카라게임 온라인 바카라 게임 5 at Noon
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Made in the USA? Proposed rule clarifies grocery meat labels

Under the new requirements announced Monday by federal agriculture officials, the labels would be allowed on meat, poultry or eggs only if they come from animals 'born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States.'

Made in the USA? Proposed rule clarifies grocery meat labels

Under the new requirements announced Monday by federal agriculture officials, the labels would be allowed on meat, poultry or eggs only if they come from animals 'born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States.'

If you are willing to eat meat that is lab created, you are not alone. According to *** study of 2001 americans conducted by one poll on behalf of Farm Forward, 67% say they would eat cultured meat that was grown in *** lab setting, 58% are willing to eat plant based proteins, Inflation is also causing some shopping trends to change. In fact, 64% are considering plant based options for their holiday dinners. 60% trust labels that claim their foods are natural or organic. Farm forward study found that 91% expect the government to take action to make sure brands are telling the truth on their labels, knowing what you're eating is important.
Advertisement
Made in the USA? Proposed rule clarifies grocery meat labels

Under the new requirements announced Monday by federal agriculture officials, the labels would be allowed on meat, poultry or eggs only if they come from animals 'born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States.'

Shoppers could soon find it easier to tell if those grocery store steaks or pork chops were really "Made in the USA."Federal agriculture officials on Monday released new requirements that would allow labels on meat, poultry, or eggs to use that phrase 바카라 게임 웹사이트” or "Product of USA" 바카라 게임 웹사이트” only if they come from animals "born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States." That's a sharp change from current policy, which allows voluntary use of such labels on products from animals that have been imported from a foreign country and slaughtered in the U.S., but also on meat that's been imported and repackaged or further processed.Imports of beef from countries including Australia, Canada, and Brazil, for instance, account for about 12% of the total consumed in the U.S. Overall, imports of red meat and poultry account for less than 6%, while imports of eggs account for less than half of 1%.U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the proposed rule would better align the labels with consumers' views. A survey commissioned by the USDA found that nearly two-thirds of shoppers believed that a "Product of USA" label meant that most or all meat production steps occurred in the U.S."There's obviously a disconnect between what the consumers' understandings and expectations are and what the label currently is," Vilsack said in an interview.About 12% of all meat, poultry, and egg products sold in the country carry the U.S.-origin labels, USDA officials said.The label change was first proposed by President Joe Biden in 2021 and was included last year in a series of steps to bolster the U.S. meat and poultry supply chain.The USDA survey, conducted last summer, included a nationally representative sample of more than 4,800 American adults who do the grocery shopping for their families and who bought beef or pork in the previous six months. More than 40% of the shoppers said they look for the USA label when buying meat.The rule was praised by consumer advocates and representatives for U.S. ranchers and farmers, including the U.S. Cattlemen's Association, which petitioned the USDA for the label change in 2019."The proposed rule finally closes this loophole by accurately defining what these voluntary origin claims mean," Justin Tupper, the group's president, said. "If it says 'Made in the USA,' then it should be from cattle that have only known USA soil. Consumers have the right to know where their food comes from, full stop."Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy for the Consumer Federation of America, said the change is a "small but important step" that should have been made long ago.Under the current rule, Gremillion noted, a cow can be raised in Mexico under that country's regulations for feed and medications, then shipped across the border and slaughtered that same day to make ground beef and steaks that qualify as "Product of USA."Carrie Balkcom, executive director of the trade group American Grassfed Association, said the existing rule also penalizes small domestic producers."It's expensive to raise grass-raised animals from scratch," Balkcom said. "And these large producers were importing these animals raised elsewhere and just repackaging them and then kind of coasting on the 'Made in the USA' label."An official with the North American Meat Institute, which represents large firms that process most of the meat and poultry products sold in the U.S., said she hadn't seen details of the new rule. But Sarah Little added, the group "opposes overly prescriptive labeling requirements that will raise prices for consumers."Another industry group, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has called for eliminating the voluntary USA labels entirely and allowing for strict labeling standards verified by the USDA.The voluntary labeling rules are different from country-of-origin labels, known as COOL, which required companies to disclose where animals supplying beef and pork are born, raised, and slaughtered. That requirement was rolled back in 2015, after international trade disputes and a ruling from the World Trade Organization.Country-of-origin labels are still required for other foods, including fish, shellfish, fresh and frozen fruit and vegetables, and more.Companies won't have to prove that their products are American-made before using the labels, but they will have to file documentation. The proposal applies only to meat, poultry, and eggs, products overseen by the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service, which can pull the label if companies are found to violate the rule.The label proposal is open for public comment before it becomes final.

Shoppers could soon find it easier to tell if those grocery store steaks or pork chops were really "Made in the USA."

Federal agriculture officials on Monday released new requirements that would allow labels on meat, poultry, or eggs to use that phrase 바카라 게임 웹사이트” or "Product of USA" 바카라 게임 웹사이트” only if they come from animals "born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States."

Advertisement

That's a sharp change from current policy, which allows voluntary use of such labels on products from animals that have been imported from a foreign country and slaughtered in the U.S., but also on meat that's been imported and repackaged or further processed.

Imports of beef from countries including Australia, Canada, and Brazil, for instance, account for about 12% of the total consumed in the U.S. Overall, imports of red meat and poultry account for less than 6%, while imports of eggs account for less than half of 1%.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the proposed rule would better align the labels with consumers' views. A survey commissioned by the USDA found that nearly two-thirds of shoppers believed that a "Product of USA" label meant that most or all meat production steps occurred in the U.S.

"There's obviously a disconnect between what the consumers' understandings and expectations are and what the label currently is," Vilsack said in an interview.

About 12% of all meat, poultry, and egg products sold in the country carry the U.S.-origin labels, USDA officials said.

The label change was first proposed by President Joe Biden in 2021 and was included last year in a series of steps to bolster the U.S. meat and poultry supply chain.

The USDA survey, conducted last summer, included a nationally representative sample of more than 4,800 American adults who do the grocery shopping for their families and who bought beef or pork in the previous six months. More than 40% of the shoppers said they look for the USA label when buying meat.

The rule was praised by consumer advocates and representatives for U.S. ranchers and farmers, including the U.S. Cattlemen's Association, which petitioned the USDA for the label change in 2019.

"The proposed rule finally closes this loophole by accurately defining what these voluntary origin claims mean," Justin Tupper, the group's president, said. "If it says 'Made in the USA,' then it should be from cattle that have only known USA soil. Consumers have the right to know where their food comes from, full stop."

Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy for the Consumer Federation of America, said the change is a "small but important step" that should have been made long ago.

Under the current rule, Gremillion noted, a cow can be raised in Mexico under that country's regulations for feed and medications, then shipped across the border and slaughtered that same day to make ground beef and steaks that qualify as "Product of USA."

Carrie Balkcom, executive director of the trade group American Grassfed Association, said the existing rule also penalizes small domestic producers.

"It's expensive to raise grass-raised animals from scratch," Balkcom said. "And these large producers were importing these animals raised elsewhere and just repackaging them and then kind of coasting on the 'Made in the USA' label."

An official with the North American Meat Institute, which represents large firms that process most of the meat and poultry products sold in the U.S., said she hadn't seen details of the new rule. But Sarah Little added, the group "opposes overly prescriptive labeling requirements that will raise prices for consumers."

Another industry group, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has called for eliminating the voluntary USA labels entirely and allowing for strict labeling standards verified by the USDA.

The voluntary labeling rules are different from country-of-origin labels, known as COOL, which required companies to disclose where animals supplying beef and pork are born, raised, and slaughtered. That requirement was rolled back in 2015, after international trade disputes and a ruling from the World Trade Organization.

Country-of-origin labels are still required for other foods, including fish, shellfish, fresh and frozen fruit and vegetables, and more.

Companies won't have to prove that their products are American-made before using the labels, but they will have to file documentation. The proposal applies only to meat, poultry, and eggs, products overseen by the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service, which can pull the label if companies are found to violate the rule.

The label proposal is open for public comment before it becomes final.